![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]()
Concert Program for September 22, 23, 24, and 25, 2005
Profiles David Robertson
Of special note this season are six appearances at Carnegie Hall where David Robertson is a Perspectives artist. The Perspectives Series includes four performances with the Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra: a November 18 Sound Insights concert “Seeing Debussy, Hearing Monet,” and a November 19 program featuring works by Mozart, Feldman, and Mahler, both of which take place in Stern Auditorium; a concert version of Jarrell’s Cassandre on March 31 in Zankel Hall, and an April 1 performance in Stern Auditorium with the Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra and Chorus featuring John Adams’s On the Transmigration of Souls and Brahms’s Ein Deutsches Requiem. A recognized expert in 20th- and 21st-century music with extensive international conducting credits, Mr. Robertson has held several posts abroad. Prior to his Saint Louis Symphony appointment, Mr. Robertson was Music Director of the Orchestre National de Lyon and Artistic Director of that city’s auditorium, posts he held from 2000-04. His tenure there marked the first time that one artist held both musical posts in Lyon. From 1992-2000, he was Music Director of the Ensemble Intercontemporain in Paris, of which Pierre Boulez is Honorary President, and from 1985-1987, he was resident conductor of the Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra. Born in Santa Monica, California, Mr.
Robertson was educated at London’s Royal Academy of Music, where he
studied French horn and composition before turning to orchestral
conducting. Musical America named him Conductor of the Year
for 2000. In 1997, Mr. Robertson was named a recipient of the Seaver/National
Endowment for the Arts Conductors Award, the premier prize of its
kind, given to exceptionally gifted American conductors. He has two
teenage sons and is married to pianist Orli Shaham.
Her acclaimed performances on the opera stage comprise the great Mozart roles (Pamina, Ilia, Susanna, Despina) as well as modern works by Stravinsky, Poulenc, and Messiaen. From Salzburg and Paris to the Metropolitan Opera, where she began her career in 1984 and has since made nearly 300 appearances, Dawn Upshaw has also championed numerous new works created for her including The Great Gatsby by John Harbison; L’Amour de Loin by Kaija Saariaho; John Adams’s nativity oratorio El Nino; and Osvaldo Golijov’s chamber opera Ainadamar and song cycle Ayre. Ms. Upshaw opened the 2005-06 season at the Santa Fe Opera in a new Peter Sellars production of Ainadamar, which will be revived in January as part of Lincoln Center’s Great Performers festival “The Passion of Osvaldo Golijov.” The festival also features Ms. Upshaw in Ayre, which she tours in October with the instrumental ensemble Eighth Blackbird. She continues to Boston and Carnegie Hall with James Levine and the Boston Symphony Orchestra in performances of Lukas Foss’s Time Cycle. Other season highlights include guest appearances with Richard Goode at Carnegie Hall as part of the Perspectives Series; the world premiere of John Harbison’s Milosz Songs with the New York Philharmonic and Robert Spano; performances of John Adams’s El Nino at Walt Disney Hall with the Los Angeles Philharmonic and Esa-Pekka Salonen; a first-time collaboration with Mstislav Rostropovich and the National Symphony Orchestra; a European tour with the Australian Chamber Orchestra and Richard Tognetti, and a US recital tour with pianist Gilbert Kalish. Ms. Upshaw is a member of the faculty at the Tanglewood Music Center, and in 2006 begins an association with the Bard College Conservatory of Music for which she has designed a master’s degree program in the vocal arts. Born in Nashville, Tennessee, and raised in Park Forest, Illinois, she now lives near New York City with her husband and their two children. Dawn Upshaw most recently performed with
the SLSO in November 1994. Amy Kaiser One of the country’s leading choral directors, Amy Kaiser has conducted the Saint Louis Symphony in Vivaldi’s Gloria, Handel’s Messiah, Schubert’s Mass in E flat, sacred works by Haydn and Mozart and Young People’s Concerts. She has made eight guest appearances with the Berkshire Choral Festival, most recently conducting Puccini’s Messa di Gloria and Rossini’s Stabat Mater at Canterbury Cathedral. Other conducting engagements include concerts at Chicago’s Grant Park Music Festival and more than fifty performances with the Metropolitan Opera Guild. Principal Conductor of the New York Chamber Symphony’s School Concert Series for seven seasons, Ms. Kaiser also led many programs for the 92nd Street Y’s acclaimed Schubertiade and appeared as guest conductor with New York area orchestras. She has conducted over twenty-five operas, including eight contemporary premieres. Ms. Kaiser was also guest conductor for the Oklahoma Summer Arts Institute, Santa Fe Symphony, St. Louis Philharmonic and Saint Louis Symphony Youth Orchestra. In May she will serve as faculty for a choral/orchestral conducting workshop with Chorus America and the Philadelphia Singers. Ms. Kaiser has prepared choruses for the
New York Philharmonic, the Ravinia Festival, the Mostly Mozart
Festival, and the Opera Orchestra of New York. Former Music Director
of the Dessoff Choirs and the Mannes Chamber Singers in New York,
she also served on the faculties of the Manhattan School of Music
and the Mannes College of Music. An alumna of Smith College, she was
awarded the Smith College Medal for outstanding professional
achievement.
Today’s orchestral repertory spans some three centuries of creativity and several major historical periods, each with its own distinctive style. Music from the classical period -- the era of Mozart and Haydn -- is notable for its refined eloquence, that of the romantic 19th century for its emotional intensity, that of the modern era for its originality and inventiveness. We tend to think of music, like science or technology, as developing in a linear fashion, each generation of composers adding to the achievements of its predecessors, the palette of harmonies, instrumental colors, and other resources available to it growing ever more complex. But the reality is not so simple. Throughout music’s history, composers have reached back in time, appropriating ideas from the past and paying homage to earlier composers, even while creating work that is very much of their own era. As a result, we often find old and new, traditional and modern, mingling in individual compositions, much as these traits often do on concert programs as a whole. Our concert presents music from the 18th and 20th centuries. But this description, although true enough, does not fully convey the wealth of temporal allusions and echoes embodied in this music. For each of the modern -- or perhaps, in some cases, post-modern -- works we hear contain strong echoes of earlier compositional idioms or even specific pieces. On this program, time -- at least as it is reckoned by music’s historical styles -- moves not so much in a linear as in a fluid, serpentine fashion. A mingling of old and new musical thought is especially conspicuous in the composition that opens our program. Chorale Variations on “Vom Himmel hoch” is really the work of two composers living two centuries apart. It has its genesis in a set of five organ chorale‑preludes written by J. S. Bach in 1747. Each piece in the set is based on Martin Luther’s Christmas hymn “Vom Himmel hoch, da komm’ich her.” Around this melody Bach spun ornate countermelodies in imitative counterpoint to create his five chorale-preludes, which together constitute a kind of elaborate set of variations on Luther’s hymn. In February 1956, Igor Stravinsky arranged Bach’s organ music for chorus and orchestra, in which form we hear it now. Stravinsky prefaces the
five variations with a presentation by the brass instruments of
the chorale melody itself. This initial statement is as faithful a
transcription of Bach as Stravinsky will offer throughout the
work. Each of the ensuing five variations preserves the outline of
the older composer’s music but varies the harmonies, subtly alters
rhythms, and adds inner melodies. Moreover, Stravinsky’s
instrumentation changes the entire character of the work,
providing a variety of colors, textures, and registrations beyond
the reach of Bach’s organ. Particularly characteristic is
Stravinsky’s staccato articulation for many of the melodic lines.
But the most conspicuous feature of this arrangement is the
addition of the chorus, which is assigned the chorale theme
beginning with the second variation. The voices add a human
element to what might otherwise seem a somewhat abstract exercise,
reminding us that the learned contrapuntal discourse arises from
the singing of a humble carol.
By contrast, the concert aria “Bella mia fiamma… Resta, o cara,” is a scena, a dramatic recitative-and-aria typical of a certain style of opera in Mozart’s day. The text is from a drama entitled Cyrere placata, which indeed served as an opera libretto for at least one other composer. In the drama the hero Titano has angered the goddess Ceres (the Roman equivalent of the better-known Greek deity Demeter) by eloping with her daughter, Prosperina. For this affront, Ceres punishes Titano with distant exile -- prompting, of course, a song of anguished farewell, in which the protagonist equates separation from his lover with death. Removed from its original context, the verses express sentiments that might be voiced by a woman as well as a man, and Mozart wrote this aria for an accomplished soprano who was also a good friend. His prefatory recitative establishes a plaintive tone and prepares the aria that follows. The latter is in two parts: an Andante marked by intense chromatic inflections of melody and harmony, and an animated Allegro. With the Canadian composer Claude Vivier, we return to more recent time, but also to a musical syntax redolent of ancient practice. Born in Montreal in 1948, Vivier studied at the Montreal Conservatory and subsequently in Europe. After returning to Canada and teaching for several years, he undertook a long trip to Asia and the Middle East. Afterward he observed: “I realize that this journey was, above all, one of self-discovery.” Specifically, Vivier’s sojourns in Japan, Bali, and Iran confirmed his growing dissatisfaction with the highly cerebral nature of much recent Western composition, and he increasingly began to write in a manner influenced by the Asian music he encountered during his travels. That influence was,
however, filtered through a remarkable sonic imagination. Although
Vivier wrote melodies hinting at exotic chant and modal harmonies
that recall those of Eastern or medieval composers, his music
could never be mistaken for any traditional kind -- nor, indeed,
for that of any other recent composer. Its instrumental colors are
quite unique, and Vivier often expanded his harmonic palette with
additional tones derived from the natural overtone series, thereby
creating sounds that seem at once modern and primeval. He also
took to setting vocal texts written in a language of his own
invention. The result now appears to be one of the more original
bodies of composition created during the late 20th century.
Although its concern with chant-like melody and its intimations of
an otherworldly spirituality resonate with the music of recently
fashionable composers such as Arvo Pärt, Sofia Gubaidulina, and
Olivier Messiaen, Vivier’s work is distinctive. Often it seems to
be music of some strange and previously unknown culture.
Like Vivier, but with very different results, the American composer John Adams broke, early in his career, from the arcane procedures for writing atonal music that characterized academic modernism in the 1950s and 60s. Initially drawn to the techniques of a group of American outsiders whose style became known, by analogy, with trends in painting and sculpture, as “minimalism,” Adams evolved steadily during the 1980s and 90s, developing an idiom that combined repeating motifs, rhythmic pulsation, and static or slow-moving harmonies -- all signature minimalist devices -- with colorful orchestration, a wide range of expressive nuance, and a rich harmonic vocabulary. He thereby created what some commentators have described as a “post-minimalist” style, one that has proven complex, flexible, and fertile. Its rhythmic vitality marks it as contemporary American; its harmonic language entails echoes of the romantic era.
The opening movement begins with pounding chords and pulsating figures in the classic minimalist manner before turning to more lyrical expression in a long central episode. A brief reprise of the opening material rounds off this initial portion of the work. Adams explains that he was intently studying the writings of C. G. Jung at the time he composed Harmonielehre and was particularly impressed by the psychologist’s discussion of the legend of King Anfortas and his wound that will not heal. The second movement captures the melancholy spirit of the Anfortas story. As for the finale, its title derives, Adams explains, from a dream in which he imagined his infant daughter, then called “Quackie,” floating in the heavens while perched on the shoulders of the medieval mystic Meister Eckhardt. This movement opens, appropriately, with a cradle song but gathers energy and momentum as it builds to a climactic conclusion. Program notes © 2005 by Paul Schiavo Texts: From heaven
above to earth I come
Praise the Lord, all ye nations: praise Him, all
ye people. “Bella mia fiamma . . . Resta, o cara”
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||